Navy Fires Three Top Commanders of USS South Dakota
Lawmakers say they learned of the October firings only through a media report, not from the Navy.
Updated on Nov. 12, 2026 in Military

Live Poll
Do you trust the military to keep Congress informed about its leadership decisions?
The Navy fired the commanding officer, executive officer, and chief of the boat of the nuclear submarine USS South Dakota on October 14. The firings were not reported to Congress and became known only after a Connecticut newspaper asked questions about the submarine's leadership.
Why it matters
Congressional oversight of military personnel decisions depends on timely notification, and lawmakers say they were left uninformed about the removal of the submarine's top three leaders. Reps. Joe Courtney and Adam Smith have voiced deep frustration with the Navy over the lack of disclosure.
Three of the submarine's top leaders were removed on October 14, 2026, according to the Navy's disclosure to the press. The reasons for the removals and the Navy's full account have not been made public.
The players
Joe Courtney
Joe Courtney is a U.S. Representative from Connecticut and the ranking member of the House Seapower and Projection Forces Subcommittee, which oversees naval shipbuilding and force structure.
Adam Smith
Adam Smith is a U.S. Representative from Washington and the ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee, the chamber's principal panel for defense policy.
U.S. Navy
The U.S. Navy is the naval warfare branch of the United States Armed Forces, responsible for operating the submarine fleet, including nuclear-powered attack submarines such as USS South Dakota.
The details
The Navy fired the three top commanders of the nuclear submarine privately, and the firings were disclosed only after The Day asked about the submarine's leadership. Reps. Joe Courtney and Adam Smith then sent a letter to the Navy expressing deep frustration that they had not been informed.
Timeline
October 14, 2026: The Navy fires USS South Dakota's commanding officer, executive officer, and chief of the boat.
November 11, 2026: The Day, a Connecticut newspaper, asks the Navy about the submarine's leadership.
November 12, 2026: Criticism from Courtney and Smith over the lack of notification is reported.
Roadmap
Congressional armed services committees have long relied on the Navy to report senior leadership changes on nuclear vessels, which makes the undisclosed firings of USS South Dakota's top three leaders a notable break from that practice. The episode puts pressure on oversight mechanisms that govern how the Navy communicates personnel decisions to lawmakers.
Readers following naval readiness can track whether the Navy provides Congress with a formal account of the USS South Dakota leadership changes. Congressional oversight letters and committee hearings are the typical channels through which such explanations are requested and delivered.
The takeaway
Oversight of military personnel decisions depends on timely communication between the armed services and Congress. Readers should watch for whether the Navy issues a formal explanation of the USS South Dakota firings.
Further reading
For more on how the armed forces handle senior leadership changes, browse the Military section.
Live Poll
Do you trust the military to keep Congress informed about its leadership decisions?










