Mullin Urges Cheaper Counter-Drone Technology
The Homeland Security secretary called for affordable counter-drone systems to protect more than military and federal sites.
Updated on Nov. 9, 2026 in Terrorism

Live Poll
Should local police and public venues get more authority and funding to stop drones?
Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin called for more affordable and effective counter-drone technology during remarks at the Drone Security Industry and SLTT Grant Forum on November 9 at MGM National Harbor in Maryland. He urged industry to extend drone protection beyond military and federal facilities.
Why it matters
Mullin said intercepting a $20 drone with a $40,000 missile is unsustainable, and inexpensive drones have shown the limits of traditional defenses in Ukraine. Current federal law also restricts who can use certain counter-drone mitigation technologies.
Mullin cited a $40,000 missile used against a $20 drone, illustrating the cost gap in current interception methods. The source does not indicate whether any specific counter-drone program or legal change has been finalized.
The players
Markwayne Mullin
Mullin is the Secretary of Homeland Security who served as a Republican U.S. senator from Oklahoma before his appointment to the department.
Commercial Drone Alliance
The Commercial Drone Alliance is an industry group that advocates for commercial drone operators and co-hosted the forum.
The details
Mullin spoke with Commercial Drone Alliance CEO Lisa Ellman at the forum, which was hosted by the Commercial Drone Alliance, DRONERESPONDERS, and the White House Task Force on the 2028 Summer Olympics. He suggested leasing arrangements could help state, local, tribal, and territorial agencies acquire counter-drone equipment without large upfront purchases.
Timeline
November 9, 2026: Mullin delivers counter-drone remarks at the Drone Security Industry and SLTT Grant Forum.
Legal Context
Mullin's remarks build on lessons from the war in Ukraine, where inexpensive drones have exposed the limits of traditional defense systems. The domestic push for cheaper counter-drone tools also runs into existing federal restrictions on who may use certain mitigation technologies.
Local agencies and event organizers may soon have access to leasing options for counter-drone equipment, reducing upfront costs. Readers should monitor federal policy changes that would expand who can use certain mitigation technologies.
The takeaway
Lower-cost interception tools are becoming a central concern as drone threats spread beyond the battlefield. Expanding affordable protection to more sites will depend on both industry innovation and changes to current federal rules.
Further reading
Explore more coverage in the Terrorism section for context on how drone threats are being addressed.
Live Poll
Should local police and public venues get more authority and funding to stop drones?










