Democratic Trifectas Weigh National Popular Vote Compact

Several Democrat-led states are discussing joining an interstate pact that would award electoral votes to the national popular vote winner.

Updated on Nov. 6, 2026 in Elections

Bold flat-color editorial illustration of a ballot box silhouette beside a column of cream tokens against a deep navy field, evoking the Electoral College debate.
Several Democrat-led states are weighing membership in the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, which would award their electoral votes to the national popular vote winner once 270 votes are reached. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Should the president be chosen by national popular vote instead of the Electoral College?

Democratic trifecta states are discussing joining the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, which has 18 states and the District of Columbia and a combined 222 Electoral College votes. Under the compact, member states would award their electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote once they reach 270 votes.

Why it matters

If member states reached the 270-vote threshold, the compact could effectively nullify the Electoral College, and it would immediately face court challenges. Congress has attempted Electoral College reform repeatedly since 1950 without success.

Compact members hold 222 of the 270 electoral votes needed for activation, leaving 48 votes outstanding. Five Democratic trifecta states, including Pennsylvania, hold a combined 61 electoral votes, but the extraction does not confirm whether they will join.

The players

National Popular Vote Interstate Compact

An interstate agreement launched in 2006 under which member states pledge their electoral votes to the national popular vote winner once enough states join.

Lehigh County Democratic Party

A local Pennsylvania party organization whose leaders commented on the compact's prospects in their region.

The details

Compact states would award their electoral votes to whichever presidential candidate wins the national popular vote, even if that candidate lost their individual state. The push follows the losses of Al Gore and Hillary Clinton despite their popular-vote wins, which has fueled dissatisfaction with the Electoral College.

Timeline

  1. 2006: The National Popular Vote organization launched the compact.

  2. 1950: Congressional attempts to reform the Electoral College began; all have failed.

  3. November 3, 2026: Five states, including Pennsylvania, elected Democratic trifectas.

Political Context

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact has been pursued since 2006 as an alternative to constitutional amendments, which have repeatedly stalled. Opposition typically centers on arguments that the compact would sidestep the Electoral College's federalist design.

If the compact reaches its activation threshold, the presidential winner in participating states would be determined by the national popular vote rather than state-level results. Voters in every state would see their electoral influence shift accordingly.

The takeaway

The compact's future depends on whether enough states with a combined 270 electoral votes join it, a threshold the current group has not yet reached. Readers should watch for formal legislative action rather than discussion alone.

Further reading

Explore more on the Elections beat for context on how Electoral College reform efforts have unfolded.

Live Poll

Should the president be chosen by national popular vote instead of the Electoral College?