17 States Support New York Fraud Case Against Trump
A coalition led by Oregon's Attorney General filed an amicus brief in the ongoing civil fraud case.
Updated on Oct. 30, 2026 in Financial Crime
Live Poll
Should state attorneys general have the power to prosecute business fraud if the victim remains silent?
Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield and a coalition of 17 states filed a friend-of-the-court brief supporting New York's civil fraud lawsuit against Donald Trump. The case, now before the New York Court of Appeals, examines allegations that the former president and his associates inflated asset values to secure favorable loan and insurance terms.
Why it matters
The coalition argues that state fraud laws protect fair market competition and must be enforceable regardless of whether individual banks initiate complaints. They contend that limiting state oversight would weaken the enforcement authority of attorneys general across the country.
A 17-state coalition filed an amicus brief with the New York Court of Appeals in the pending People v. Trump civil fraud case. The defendants maintain that New York lacks authority to pursue the matter because the private banks involved did not report losses.
The players
Dan Rayfield
He is the Oregon Attorney General who spearheaded the multi-state coalition filing.
Donald Trump
He is the current President of the United States who faces civil fraud allegations in New York.
Eric Trump
He is a defendant in the case who is accused alongside other associates of inflating asset valuations.
Allen Weisselberg
He is a former executive named as a defendant in the civil fraud lawsuit.
Jeffrey McConney
He is an associate named in the legal filing regarding the inflation of assets.
The details
The lawsuit alleges that Donald Trump, Eric Trump, Allen Weisselberg, and Jeffrey McConney manipulated asset valuations to gain financial advantages. The participating coalition includes attorneys general from Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington.
Timeline
The coalition filed the amicus brief on October 24, 2026.
Legal Context
This case highlights an ongoing debate over the scope of state fraud laws and their application to private market transactions. By intervening, the coalition seeks to clarify that attorneys general can protect market integrity using New York's civil fraud statute independently of private complaints.
The outcome of this case may set a legal precedent for how state officials across the country handle investigations into asset-based fraud. Residents may see long-term changes in how state-level regulatory agencies prioritize and pursue white-collar financial crimes.
The takeaway
This filing underscores the collective effort by state attorneys general to maintain robust oversight of financial markets. Observers should watch the New York Court of Appeals for a ruling that could define the boundaries of state authority in future business fraud cases.
Further reading
For more background on legal proceedings, visit the Financial Crime section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by KTVZ.
Live Poll
Should state attorneys general have the power to prosecute business fraud if the victim remains silent?
