SLT Sues Lagree Fitness for Breach of Contract

The fitness studio chain is seeking at least $50 million in damages from the equipment manufacturer.

Updated on Oct. 28, 2026 in Body Building

Isometric editorial illustration of sleek metallic springs and carriage rails, representing a technical commercial fitness equipment dispute.
SLT filed a $50 million lawsuit against Lagree Fitness in California, alleging the manufacturer manipulated equipment supply to revoke NYC exclusivity rights. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Is it fair for companies to use supply shortages to force changes in existing contracts?

In October 2026, SLT filed a lawsuit in California federal court against Lagree Fitness. The complaint alleges the manufacturer breached licensing agreements dating back to 2011.

Why it matters

The legal dispute centers on the supply and licensing of Megaformer equipment, which is central to the SLT brand. SLT claims the manufacturer used equipment shortages to force the surrender of territorial exclusivity rights in New York City.

SLT currently operates more than 20 studios across five states. The chain is seeking a minimum of $50 million in damages regarding its long-standing contract with Lagree Fitness.

The players

SLT

A fitness company founded in 2011 that operates a chain of studios specializing in a 50-minute workout.

Lagree Fitness

The manufacturer of the Megaformer fitness equipment used in specialized training studios.

The details

SLT alleges that Lagree Fitness refused to supply necessary Megaformers for new locations unless the chain relinquished its exclusivity rights in New York City. Lagree Fitness disputes these claims, rejecting allegations that it manufactured equipment shortages to undermine the studio chain.

Timeline

  1. Licensing agreements between SLT and Lagree Fitness began in 2011.

  2. SLT filed its lawsuit against Lagree Fitness in October 2026.

Season Trajectory

This lawsuit highlights the fragility of franchise-supplier relationships within the boutique fitness sector. The outcome will likely influence how specialized fitness chains secure equipment and maintain territorial rights against their own manufacturers.

The litigation may impact the expansion plans for SLT locations if equipment supply chains remain constrained. Participants in the standard 50-minute workout sessions should monitor for potential changes to studio availability or equipment updates.

The takeaway

Commercial disputes in the boutique fitness space often hinge on the specific language of long-term licensing agreements. Business owners in similar industries should ensure their contracts clearly define equipment supply obligations to avoid future territorial conflicts.

Further reading

Learn more about the industry in the Body Building section.

Source note: This article includes information reported by Inc..

Live Poll

Is it fair for companies to use supply shortages to force changes in existing contracts?