FinCEN Fines Bank of America $1.2 Billion
The bank faces a record penalty for failing to report over $5 billion in suspicious transactions.
Updated on Oct. 27, 2026 in Financial Crime
Live Poll
Do you trust that major national banks maintain sufficient oversight to prevent financial crimes?
The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) assessed a $1.2 billion civil penalty against Bank of America for delays in reporting suspicious activity. This enforcement action follows the bank's failure to address longstanding deficiencies in its anti-money laundering program.
Why it matters
The penalty underscores the critical importance of robust monitoring systems for detecting and reporting illicit financial activity. Regulators are intensifying efforts to ensure major institutions promptly alert authorities to transactions that may threaten national security.
FinCEN assessed a $1.2 billion penalty for reporting delays, with $750 million credited from an OCC assessment. Additionally, Bank of America agreed to pay $11,662,930 to settle civil liability regarding apparent sanctions violations.
The players
FinCEN
This bureau of the U.S. Department of the Treasury collects and analyzes information about financial transactions to combat domestic and international money laundering.
Bank of America
This multinational investment bank and financial services holding company is one of the largest banking institutions in the United States.
OCC
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency charters, regulates, and supervises all national banks and federal savings associations.
The details
Bank of America relied on third-party requests and external inquiries instead of its own monitoring systems to identify suspicious transactions. The bank also failed to escalate potential concerns to investigators for more than a year despite prior warnings.
Timeline
December 2024: The OCC ordered the bank to address anti-money laundering deficiencies.
13 October 2026: FinCEN assessed the $1.2 billion civil penalty against the bank.
Legal Context
This enforcement action aligns with the Bank Secrecy Act's anti-money laundering requirements for financial institutions. The case reflects a broader trend of federal regulators imposing stringent penalties when banks repeatedly fail to correct identified oversight deficiencies.
The bank must now work with an independent consultant to identify previously undetected suspicious transactions. This corrective process aims to strengthen the bank's internal monitoring to better protect the national financial system.
The takeaway
Institutions must proactively maintain their internal compliance systems to avoid severe regulatory consequences for reporting lapses. Effective monitoring of suspicious activity is a fundamental requirement for maintaining the security of the broader financial ecosystem.
Further reading
For more information on regulatory oversight, visit the Financial Crime section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by International Business Times UK.
Live Poll
Do you trust that major national banks maintain sufficient oversight to prevent financial crimes?
