White House Report Projects High Costs of Open Borders

A new economic report warns that ending current immigration enforcement could cost the federal government billions.

Updated on Oct. 20, 2026 in Immigration

Bold flat-color editorial illustration of a neoclassical archway, evoking the weight and gravity of national fiscal policy.
A new Council of Economic Advisers report projects that ending current border enforcement could add billions to the federal budget deficit. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Do you believe providing legal status and benefits to illegal immigrants is a sound economic policy?

The Council of Economic Advisers released a report in October 2026 outlining the fiscal impact of immigration and social policy proposals. The findings suggest that ending enforcement and expanding federal benefits could add hundreds of billions to the national deficit.

Why it matters

The administration argues that current border security measures are essential to reducing federal expenditures and maintaining public safety. The report warns that proposed policy shifts could lead to significant long-term increases in government spending.

Ending immigration enforcement and providing legal status is projected to cost $440 billion to $613 billion over 10 years. Additionally, the administration reported that 3 million illegal immigrants have departed the United States since January 2025.

The players

Council of Economic Advisers

This is the executive agency that provides the President with objective economic analysis and advice on the development and implementation of a wide range of domestic and international economic policy.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement

This is the federal law enforcement agency under the Department of Homeland Security responsible for identifying, investigating, and dismantling vulnerabilities in the nation's border, economic, transportation, and infrastructure security.

The details

The report highlights that current border policies have resulted in 16 consecutive months without releasing illegal immigrants following apprehension. Meanwhile, Homeland Security task forces have focused on criminal organizations, successfully locating 157,000 previously unaccounted-for migrant children.

Timeline

  1. January 20, 2025 marked the beginning of the administration's immigration enforcement period.

  2. August 2026 saw record border apprehension and drug seizure benchmarks.

  3. October 8, 2026 concluded the reported window for Tren de Aragua arrests.

  4. October 2026 featured the official release of the White House economic report.

Political Context

The report directly challenges the Democratic Socialists of America's proposed social spending initiatives by calculating their long-term fiscal impact. Opposition groups likely argue that these estimates overstate potential costs while ignoring the potential economic contributions of immigrants.

Changes to federal immigration and social spending policies can directly influence national tax burdens and the availability of taxpayer-funded assistance programs. Taxpayers may see these figures cited in future debates regarding budget priorities and federal deficit management.

The takeaway

The report underscores the significant fiscal trade-offs inherent in national immigration and social welfare debates. Readers should monitor upcoming federal budget discussions to see how these projections influence legislative priorities.

Further reading

For additional context on border policies, visit the Immigration section.

Source note: This article includes information reported by [your]NEWS - Freddy Peralta to make Rays' debut vs. Rockies - The Tampa Bay Rays were active right up to Monday night's trade deadline, and their most significant addition is set to debut with his new team on Tuesday. Right-hander Freddy Peralta (5-9, 4.99 ERA), acquired from the New York Mets on Sunday, will be on the mound when Tampa Bay plays the second contest of.

Live Poll

Do you believe providing legal status and benefits to illegal immigrants is a sound economic policy?