U.S. Developers Expand Natural Gas Power Project Plans
Proposed fossil fuel capacity reaches the highest level since 2016 despite lower costs for wind and solar energy.
Updated on Oct. 20, 2026 in Utilities

Live Poll
Should the U.S. continue expanding fossil fuel power plants despite cheaper renewable energy options?
U.S. developers have increased plans for natural gas power projects as of Q2 2026. Fossil plants currently account for 30% of the 285-gigawatt national power pipeline.
Why it matters
Rising electricity demand, projected to grow 25% to 50% between 2025 and 2050, is driving developers to expand fossil capacity despite competition from renewables. Fossil fuels are expected to provide 70% of new capacity entering service in 2030.
On an unsubsidized, levelized basis, combined-cycle natural gas costs $90 per megawatt-hour, compared to $68 for onshore wind and $69 for utility-scale solar. Developers have slated 68 gigawatts of fossil capacity for service between 2026 and 2030.
The details
Developers are prioritizing natural gas to meet surging electricity needs, even as renewable alternatives remain more cost-effective on a per-unit basis. The current 285-gigawatt pipeline reflects a shift toward higher fossil fuel deployment than seen in recent years.
Timeline
The 285-gigawatt power pipeline data was captured in Q2 2026.
Fossil fuel capacity previously hit a record high in 2016.
A 47-gigawatt fossil capacity forecast for 2026-2030 was issued in 2025.
Developers plan to bring 68 gigawatts of fossil capacity online between 2026 and 2030.
U.S. electricity demand is projected to increase by 25% to 50% from 2025 to 2050.
Market Landscape
The expansion of fossil fuel projects marks a departure from the decarbonization trends incentivized by the Inflation Reduction Act's renewable energy tax credits. This move signals that developers are prioritizing reliability and load requirements over purely subsidized cost-efficiency.
Rising demand for power capacity, largely driven by the needs of EVs and data centers, suggests long-term shifts in utility planning that could influence consumer electricity rates. While natural gas remains a primary resource, the cost discrepancy between fossil fuels and renewables continues to play a significant role in utility operations.
The takeaway
The surge in fossil fuel capacity indicates that grid reliability requirements are currently outweighing the lower costs of renewable energy for many developers. Balancing this infrastructure growth with long-term climate goals remains a primary challenge for the U.S. utility sector.
Further reading
Learn more about the evolving energy sector in the Utilities section.
Live Poll
Should the U.S. continue expanding fossil fuel power plants despite cheaper renewable energy options?









