Insights Association Bars Four After Wire Fraud Pleas
The association permanently banned four individuals following their guilty pleas to conspiracy to commit wire fraud charges.
Updated on Oct. 15, 2026 in Financial Crime
Live Poll
Should professional industry associations be responsible for banning members who commit fraud?
The Insights Association has officially permanently barred four individuals from its membership rolls. The move comes after the group members pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud in a federal case.
Why it matters
The disciplinary action follows the formal conclusion of legal pleas, ensuring that those convicted of financial crimes no longer maintain affiliation with the industry group. This step reinforces membership standards following initial indictments.
Four individuals have been permanently barred from the Insights Association after entering guilty pleas for conspiracy to commit wire fraud. Three additional co-defendants in the related federal case remain international fugitives.
The players
Insights Association
This is a professional trade organization representing the market research and data analytics industry.
US Attorney's Office for the District of New Hampshire
This is the federal agency responsible for prosecuting criminal cases on behalf of the United States government within the district of New Hampshire.
The details
The Insights Association enacted the permanent bans after waiting for the completion of guilty pleas in federal court. These individuals were originally placed under suspension in April 2025 following charges brought by the US Attorney's Office for the District of New Hampshire.
Timeline
April 2025: The four individuals were initially suspended from the Insights Association.
February 2, 2026: Frank Hayden entered a guilty plea to conspiracy to commit wire fraud.
February 24, 2026: Daniel Harriman entered a guilty plea to conspiracy to commit wire fraud.
March 5, 2026: Ryan Stoudt entered a guilty plea to conspiracy to commit wire fraud.
August 31, 2026: Frank Nappo entered a guilty plea to conspiracy to commit wire fraud.
Legal Context
The association's ban reflects the industry's zero-tolerance response to violations of the federal conspiracy to commit wire fraud statute. This action mirrors broader corporate governance trends where trade groups move to distance themselves from members involved in federal criminal proceedings.
The permanent ban serves as a protective measure for the industry and the public by removing sanctioned individuals from professional membership rolls. Residents and clients of these individuals are advised that the association has officially terminated these memberships.
The takeaway
Trade organizations often enforce strict conduct policies that can lead to permanent expulsion following criminal convictions. Professionals should be aware that internal membership status is frequently contingent upon adherence to federal law and ethical conduct.
Further reading
For more information on legal and ethical standards in the sector, visit the Financial Crime section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Research Live.
Live Poll
Should professional industry associations be responsible for banning members who commit fraud?
