Cartoon Network Sought Dismissal of Privacy Lawsuit
The network asked the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals to reject a legal challenge regarding video viewing data privacy.
Updated on Oct. 11, 2026 in Cybersecurity

Live Poll
Should companies be legally responsible for how third parties use anonymized customer data?
On March 3, 2015, Cartoon Network filed an appellate brief requesting the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals dismiss a video privacy lawsuit. The legal challenge stems from allegations that the network transmitted Android IDs and video history to an analytics company.
Why it matters
The case centers on whether data appearing anonymous can be deemed personally identifiable when linked by third parties. Cartoon Network maintains that the 1988 Video Privacy Protection Act does not govern standard internet transactions.
The lawsuit involves the transmission of 64-digit identifiers from Android devices. The network argues these technical identifiers fall outside the scope of the 1988 Video Privacy Protection Act.
The players
Cartoon Network
This television network is a prominent American cable channel that broadcasts animated programming.
Mark Ellis
He is the plaintiff who initiated the legal challenge regarding the handling of viewer data.
Thomas Thrash, Jr.
He is the federal judge who presided over the case and dismissed the initial lawsuit.
Bango
This is the analytics company identified in the lawsuit as the recipient of the transmitted Android IDs.
Dow Jones
This publishing and financial news company faced a separate privacy lawsuit that was dismissed by a federal court in Atlanta.
The details
Plaintiff Mark Ellis alleges that the analytics firm Bango matched Android IDs to specific individuals using external databases to track video habits. A federal judge in Atlanta previously dismissed the lawsuit in 2014, noting that similar privacy suits, such as those against Dow Jones, have also faced dismissal.
Timeline
1988 marked the passage of the Video Privacy Protection Act.
A federal judge dismissed the lawsuit against Cartoon Network in 2014.
Cartoon Network filed its appellate brief on March 3, 2015.
The Tech Race
The case highlights the tension between legacy privacy legislation and the modern practice of using persistent device identifiers for analytics. It signals a shift in how companies defend against the potential identification of users through aggregated data.
The resolution of this case could clarify whether the device identifiers on personal smartphones are protected as private information. This may force tech companies to alter how they collect and share analytics data with third-party vendors.
The takeaway
This case underscores the difficulty in defining personal data within the evolving landscape of digital analytics. Consumers should remain aware that technical device identifiers are frequently used to link behavior to their digital profiles.
Further reading
For more information on legal and technical protections, visit Cybersecurity.
Source note: This article includes information reported by MediaPost.
Live Poll
Should companies be legally responsible for how third parties use anonymized customer data?










