Lawmakers Challenged NARA Facility Closure Plans
Proposed legislation seeks to require congressional approval before the agency can shut down regional records centers.
Updated on Oct. 2, 2026 in Law
Live Poll
Should the federal government be required to keep historic records in your local community?
Congressional members have introduced legislation aimed at preventing the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) from closing several regional facilities. The move follows NARA's June 23 announcement to shutter sites in Chicago and San Bruno and relocate holdings.
Why it matters
Lawmakers argue that closing these regional centers will limit federal agency access to essential records and risk physical damage to historical documents during transit. The proposed bills mandate that NARA obtain formal congressional approval before finalizing any facility restrictions.
Legislation introduced in both the House and Senate would require congressional approval to close or restrict regional facilities. This follows NARA's plan to close its Chicago site at 7358 S. Pulaski Road, which houses 1894 Pullman Strike case files.
The players
National Archives and Records Administration
This independent federal agency is responsible for the preservation and documentation of government and historical records.
Kevin Mullen
He is a U.S. Representative who introduced a companion bill to block the closure of regional archives.
The details
NARA informed employees of the planned closures via email on June 23, 2026, targeting facilities in Chicago and San Bruno alongside records at the Seattle Records Center. Much of the Chicago collection is slated for transfer to the National Archives at Kansas City, while Boston is set to receive Railroad Retirement Board records.
Timeline
June 23, 2026: NARA notified employees of the planned facility closures via email.
July 2026: Block Club reported on the planned facility closures.
August 2026: Rep. Kevin Mullen introduced a companion bill in the House.
Political Context
The proposed legislation seeks to curb administrative power, drawing opposition from those who prioritize NARA's internal operational efficiency and cost-saving measures. Critics of the bill argue that rigid congressional oversight could impede the agency's ability to consolidate resources effectively.
If these facilities close, local access to significant historical documents and federal case files will be effectively terminated for researchers and the public. This regulation would serve as a check on administrative reach, ensuring that public records remain accessible within their original regions.
The takeaway
Legislators are attempting to prioritize public access to historical documents over the agency's current consolidation strategy. Citizens concerned about local historical preservation may see this as a necessary step to prevent the centralization of vital federal records.
Further reading
For more information on current federal legislative proposals, visit the Law section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Block Club Chicago.
Live Poll
Should the federal government be required to keep historic records in your local community?
