Petr Aven Sued Government Over Sanctions Delisting

The businessman challenged the Office of Foreign Assets Control for delaying his application to be removed from a sanctions list.

Updated on Oct. 1, 2026 in Financial Crime

Petr Aven Sued Government Over Sanctions Delisting

Live Poll

Should government agencies be required to resolve sanction removal requests within a set deadline?

Petr Aven filed a claim in the District Court for the District of Columbia, alleging that the Office of Foreign Assets Control has unreasonably delayed his delisting application. Aven seeks a court order to force a final decision on his status.

Why it matters

Aven contends that his designation on the Russia sanctions list is no longer accurate following his divestment from Alfa Group Consortium companies. He argues that the federal agency has failed to act on his request despite significant changes to his business ties.

Aven filed his claim under the Administrative Procedure Act and 5 U.S. Code Section 706. The application for removal from the sanctions list has been pending for 17 months.

The players

Petr Aven

Petr Aven is a businessman who previously held management roles within Russian entities.

Office of Foreign Assets Control

The Office of Foreign Assets Control is a U.S. government agency that administers and enforces economic and trade sanctions.

The details

Aven was added to the EO 14024 Russia sanctions list in August 2023 and has since divested his interests in Russian entities. He claims his resignation from all management positions makes the original basis for his designation invalid.

August 2023: Petr Aven was added to the sanctions list.
December 2024: Aven divested his interests in Alfa Group Consortium companies.
April 2025: Aven submitted his formal application for delisting.
October 2026: Aven filed his legal claim against the Office of Foreign Assets Control.

Legal Context

This case follows established precedents for challenging federal inaction under the Administrative Procedure Act. It highlights the administrative hurdles faced by individuals attempting to navigate the sanctions review process after divesting from foreign assets.

The litigation clarifies the legal standards the public can expect when challenging prolonged federal administrative reviews. While the suit focuses on a specific individual, it underscores the procedural requirements for government agencies handling sanctions petitions.

The takeaway

The case highlights the importance of administrative due process for those seeking to remove their names from federal sanctions lists. It serves as a reminder that individuals can challenge government agencies through the courts when official decisions face extensive delays.