Tenth Circuit Heard Kappa Kappa Gamma Membership Case
Appellate judges weighed arguments in a lawsuit challenging the sorority's inclusion policies.
Updated on Sept. 30, 2026 in Women’s Issues

Live Poll
Should private organizations be permitted to maintain single-sex membership policies?
The U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in a lawsuit brought by plaintiffs including Allie Coghan against Kappa Kappa Gamma. The litigation centers on the sorority's membership policies following the 2022 admission of a biological male student at the University of Wyoming.
Why it matters
The case challenges the organizational policies of the sorority, as plaintiffs seek to uphold a single-sex membership mission. The judicial outcome could establish significant legal precedents regarding sorority bylaws and membership criteria nationwide.
The legal proceedings stem from a 2022 decision by the University of Wyoming chapter of Kappa Kappa Gamma to admit a biological male student. Plaintiffs, including Independent Women Ambassador Allie Coghan, filed the suit to contest these membership policies.
The players
Allie Coghan
She serves as an Independent Women Ambassador and acts as a co-plaintiff in the lawsuit Holtmeier v. Kappa Kappa Gamma.
Kappa Kappa Gamma
This is a national women's sorority currently defending its membership policies in federal court.
U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals
This is the federal appellate court tasked with hearing arguments and deciding the legal challenge.
The details
Plaintiffs in the federal lawsuit Holtmeier v. Kappa Kappa Gamma aim to enforce a single-sex mission for the organization. The matter is currently under review by the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals following oral arguments.
Timeline
The University of Wyoming chapter admitted a biological male student in 2022.
Oral arguments took place before the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals by September 30, 2026.
Culture Shift
This case sits at the center of ongoing societal debates regarding the definition of single-sex organizations in a changing cultural landscape. The litigation reflects a broader tension between traditional private club bylaws and evolving standards of inclusion.
The court's ruling may eventually necessitate changes to membership guidelines for sorority chapters across the country. Members and prospective students should monitor the legal status of these policies as they influence future recruitment procedures.
The takeaway
The ongoing legal challenge highlights the complex intersection of private association rights and membership eligibility. Observers should watch for the appellate court's decision, which will clarify the legal standing of single-sex missions in private organizations.
Further reading
Explore broader perspectives on Women’s Issues currently influencing legal and social discourse.
Source note: This article includes information reported by WFEA 1370AM.
Live Poll
Should private organizations be permitted to maintain single-sex membership policies?










