Senator Merkley Introduced Stop Corrupt Gratuities Act
The bill aims to curb corrupt payments following a major 2024 Supreme Court ruling on official gratuities.
Updated on Sept. 29, 2026 in Corruption

Live Poll
Should federal law strictly ban all gifts given to officials after they complete an action?
Senator Jeff Merkley has reintroduced the Stop Corrupt Gratuities Act to ban payments intended to influence officials. The legislation serves as a direct response to the Supreme Court ruling in Snyder v. United States, which held that state officials could accept certain gratuities for their actions.
Why it matters
The bill seeks to restore federal anti-corruption standards that were weakened by the Supreme Court. It clarifies that any gratuity provided as a reward for an official act constitutes a bribe, regardless of when the payment occurs.
The legislation follows the case of a former Portage mayor who accepted a $13,000 gratuity after awarding a $1.1 million municipal truck contract. The legal status of similar gratuity cases remains complex following the Snyder v. United States decision.
The players
Jeff Merkley
Jeff Merkley is a United States Senator who introduced the Stop Corrupt Gratuities Act.
Sheldon Whitehouse
Sheldon Whitehouse is a United States Senator and cosponsor of the legislation.
Elizabeth Warren
Elizabeth Warren is a United States Senator and cosponsor of the legislation.
Peter Welch
Peter Welch is a United States Senator and cosponsor of the legislation.
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington is an advocacy group supporting the bill.
The details
As part of the broader For Our Republic Act, this legislation aims to eliminate loopholes that allow for veiled gifts to public servants. It specifically targets gratuities provided after an official action is completed to ensure they are legally classified as bribes.
Timeline
The Supreme Court decided Snyder v. United States in 2024.
Senator Merkley reintroduced the Stop Corrupt Gratuities Act on September 29, 2026.
Legal Context
The legislation directly contradicts the precedent set by the 2024 Supreme Court ruling in Snyder v. United States. By redefining gratuities as bribes, the bill attempts to reverse the judicial narrowing of federal anti-corruption statutes.
This legislation aims to ensure accountability among elected officials by tightening the legal definition of bribery. Residents may see increased scrutiny of municipal contracts and gift-giving policies if the bill is enacted into law.
The takeaway
This bill highlights the ongoing tension between judicial interpretation of anti-corruption laws and legislative efforts to maintain high ethical standards for public servants. It serves as a reminder for citizens to monitor how their local and federal representatives handle professional gratuities.
Further reading
For more information on ongoing legislative efforts, visit Corruption.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Gorgenewscenter.
Live Poll
Should federal law strictly ban all gifts given to officials after they complete an action?










