Attorneys General Urged Security Funding for Supreme Court
A coalition of 45 state attorneys general requested $16.6 million for judicial safety and protective infrastructure.
Updated on Sept. 29, 2026 in Criminal Justice
Live Poll
Should Congress increase funding for Supreme Court security in response to rising threats?
South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley joined a coalition of 45 attorneys general to urge Congress to approve a $16.6 million security funding request for the Supreme Court. The group cited a rise in threats against federal judges as the primary driver for the proposed budget increase.
Why it matters
The requested funding addresses the mounting security risks facing members of the federal judiciary and their families. Proponents argue that enhanced protection is necessary to maintain the integrity and safety of the judicial branch during a period of high-profile threats.
The Supreme Court has requested $14.6 million for personnel protection and $2 million for an off-site command post for justices' homes. These funds are intended to address over 800 security incidents recorded during the 2025 fiscal year.
The players
Marty Jackley
He is the current Attorney General of South Dakota and a lead participant in the coalition calling for increased judicial security.
National Association of Attorneys General
This nonpartisan organization facilitates cooperation among state attorneys general to address legal and public policy challenges.
The details
Coordinated through the National Association of Attorneys General, the coalition sent a formal letter to congressional leaders seeking the appropriation. The proposal seeks to expand personal protection teams and establish new infrastructure to secure the residences of the justices.
Timeline
Fiscal year 2025 saw over 800 security incidents reported involving federal judges.
The funding request is targeted for the federal government's fiscal year 2027 budget.
Legal Context
This coordinated lobbying effort follows established patterns for state-level pressure on federal appropriation cycles. It reflects a growing trend where state officials intervene in federal security policy due to perceived inadequacies in judicial safety.
While the funding impacts federal operations, increased security measures may lead to stricter perimeter controls at judicial residences. Residents in areas surrounding the homes of federal judges could see enhanced local police presence and new traffic protocols.
The takeaway
The security request underscores the challenges of protecting judicial officials in an increasingly volatile climate. Observers should track federal spending bills to see if these specific security provisions are prioritized by congressional budget committees.
Further reading
For broader context on current policy debates, visit the Criminal Justice section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Kotatv.
Live Poll
Should Congress increase funding for Supreme Court security in response to rising threats?
