Relae and Microsoft Released TECOP Risk Framework
The new guide helps assess operational risks for large-scale carbon removal projects.
Updated on Sept. 26, 2026 in Remote Work
Live Poll
Do you trust that large-scale carbon removal projects can actually deliver on their environmental promises?
Relae and Microsoft have launched the TECOP delivery risk framework to standardize how carbon removal projects are evaluated. The tool provides a structured approach for managing technical and economic risks in the emerging carbon market.
Why it matters
Contracted carbon removal projects often face significant delivery gaps due to supply chain vulnerabilities and execution bottlenecks. This framework aims to bridge the divide between volume commitments and actual carbon removal output.
The TECOP framework evaluates projects across 5 distinct operational dimensions including technical and political factors. It addresses a market sector where contracted volumes of durable carbon removal have reached tens of millions of metric tons.
The players
Relae
Relae is a firm focused on developing standards and infrastructure for the carbon removal industry.
Microsoft
Microsoft is a global technology corporation that actively invests in and sets standards for carbon removal technologies.
The details
The TECOP framework differentiates between facility-based closed systems and decentralized open systems to tailor risk assessment strategies. Developers are required to provide proof of supply chain governance and maintain long-term contractual agreements to meet the new high-quality criteria.
Timeline
September 26, 2026: Relae and Microsoft released the TECOP framework during Climate Week in New York City.
Market Landscape
This release extends the sixth edition of the Criteria for High-Quality Carbon Dioxide Removal by introducing a specialized risk assessment layer. By standardizing these metrics, the framework positions Relae and Microsoft to influence how the wider carbon removal market manages operational integrity.
Businesses and project developers will likely face more stringent governance requirements when entering into durable carbon removal contracts. This shift may favor more established operators who can readily demonstrate the supply chain transparency required by the new framework.
The takeaway
Standardizing risk evaluation is essential for moving the carbon removal market from speculative contracts to verified atmospheric impact. Companies involved in these projects should prepare for increased audit requirements regarding their operational supply chain.
Further reading
For more information on labor and corporate infrastructure standards, visit Remote Work.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Biochar Today.
Live Poll
Do you trust that large-scale carbon removal projects can actually deliver on their environmental promises?
