Judge Dismissed Trump Lawsuit Against Des Moines Register
A judge rejected claims that the publication and its pollster violated consumer fraud laws through election coverage.
Updated on Sept. 23, 2026 in Law
Live Poll
Should media organizations face legal liability for inaccurate political polling results?
Judge Scott J. Beattie dismissed a lawsuit filed by Donald Trump against The Des Moines Register and its former pollster, J. Ann Selzer. The legal action had alleged that poll coverage misrepresented the 2024 presidential race.
Why it matters
The lawsuit centered on accusations that the publication and its pollster used inaccurate poll results to damage the former president and assist Democrats. The dismissal addressed claims that such coverage violated Iowa consumer fraud law.
The case was brought under Iowa consumer fraud statutes, which the judge found inapplicable to the challenged polling coverage. The court officially closed the matter on Wednesday, September 23, 2026.
The players
Donald Trump
Donald Trump is the current President of the United States.
The Des Moines Register
The Des Moines Register is a major daily newspaper based in Iowa known for its political coverage.
J. Ann Selzer
J. Ann Selzer is a prominent pollster who previously conducted surveys for The Des Moines Register.
Scott J. Beattie
Scott J. Beattie is the judge who presided over the legal proceedings in Des Moines.
The details
The defense argued that the lawsuit was an affront to free speech and characterized the claims as a conspiracy theory. Judge Beattie rejected the assertion that the media outlet's reporting constituted a violation of consumer fraud regulations.
Timeline
December 2024: Donald Trump filed the original lawsuit.
September 23, 2026: Judge Scott J. Beattie dismissed the case.
Political Context
The dismissal reinforces current judicial standards regarding the application of consumer protection statutes to journalistic activities. It contrasts with broader efforts by public figures to challenge media influence through civil litigation.
This decision clarifies the legal boundaries for citizens attempting to use consumer fraud laws to challenge media reporting. It reaffirms the legal protections afforded to polling organizations operating within the United States.
The takeaway
The court's decision signals that media polling is generally protected from consumer fraud challenges under current interpretations of Iowa law. Observers should note that this ruling emphasizes the high threshold for civil actions against news organizations regarding their editorial content.
Further reading
For more information on judicial precedents regarding media litigation, visit the Law section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by WTOP.
Live Poll
Should media organizations face legal liability for inaccurate political polling results?
