Cities Sued Fire Truck Manufacturers Over Pricing Schemes
Local governments allege manufacturers colluded to inflate costs and delay critical equipment deliveries.
Updated on Sept. 23, 2026 in Auto Parts
Live Poll
Should local governments sue fire truck manufacturers to combat rising equipment prices?
Des Moines, Grimes, and Johnston have joined a wave of litigation against fire vehicle manufacturers, alleging a scheme to monopolize the market and force up prices. The lawsuits claim these companies intentionally shuttered manufacturing plants to extend wait times and secure excess profits at the expense of local taxpayers.
Why it matters
The legal action highlights accusations that manufacturers are weaponizing supply chain control to dictate costs for essential public safety equipment. With single fire trucks now exceeding $1 million, municipalities contend that these market distortions have placed an unsustainable financial burden on local budgets.
A single new fire truck now costs more than $1 million. Some local departments report that the cost of a single replacement engine can reach 6 times their entire annual equipment budget.
The players
REV Group
The company is a major manufacturer of specialty vehicles, including fire apparatus, that has been named as a defendant in the antitrust litigation.
Oshkosh Corporation
This industrial company designs and builds specialty trucks and access equipment and is among the manufacturers accused of anticompetitive practices.
Pierce Manufacturing
The entity is a prominent builder of custom fire apparatus that is currently facing legal challenges regarding its market conduct and supply chain policies.
American Industrial Partners
This private equity firm is a defendant in the lawsuits and has stated it intends to defend its business practices vigorously.
The details
The lawsuits allege that defendants including the REV Group, Oshkosh Corporation, and Pierce Manufacturing systematically acquired smaller competitors to stifle innovation and restrict the availability of replacement parts. Plaintiffs argue that recent delivery delays were fabricated to maintain high prices, rather than being the result of the industry-wide labor and supply chain disruptions seen throughout 2025.
Timeline
Industry disruptions and equipment shortages were heavily reported throughout 2025.
Des Moines filed its lawsuit against the manufacturers in June 2026.
Grimes and Johnston filed their own litigation on September 18, 2026.
Roadmap
This litigation follows the 2025 firefighter union reports on equipment shortages, which set a baseline for the current industry scrutiny. The lawsuits mark a departure from the manufacturers' previous explanations, as municipalities now argue that production halts were engineered rather than caused by external market factors.
As cities grapple with these inflated costs, taxpayers may face reduced service levels or higher local levies to fund essential public safety upgrades. Municipalities may also encounter extended wait times for new units as the industry remains under legal scrutiny for its delivery practices.
The takeaway
The litigation serves as a warning for local governments to scrutinize procurement costs and reliance on single-source manufacturers for critical infrastructure. Maintaining competitive bidding processes remains the most effective defense against potential price fixing in highly consolidated sectors.
Further reading
For more on the challenges facing equipment supply, visit the Auto Parts section.
Live Poll
Should local governments sue fire truck manufacturers to combat rising equipment prices?
