NASA Issued Amendment 75 to Research Solicitations

The agency updated requirements for SciENcv biographical sketches and proposal budget formats.

Updated on Sept. 22, 2026 in Space

Bold flat-color editorial illustration of a geometric satellite sensor component, representing administrative and technical proposal standards. — NASA has updated proposal requirements for SciENcv biographical sketches and budget formats, affecting research submissions across its entire portfolio. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

NASA has published Amendment 75 to its research solicitations, introducing updated formatting requirements for SciENcv biographical sketches. The changes impact multiple program elements across the agency's research portfolio.

Why it matters

These updates ensure standardization and transparency in the proposal process for researchers. By revising documentation requirements, NASA aims to streamline the evaluation and budget tracking of scientific submissions.

Amendment 75 modifies requirements for seven program elements, specifically programs A.13, A.14, A.15, A.16, A.17, C.4, and D.4. Budget table requirements have been specifically added for anonymized proposals in programs A.15, A.16, and A.17.

The players

NASA

The United States government agency responsible for the civilian space program and aeronautics research.

The details

The agency published these changes with new text highlighted in bold and previous requirements marked as struck through. Researchers must now adhere to these revised SciENcv and budget table standards to ensure compliance with proposal submission protocols.

September 22, 2026: NASA officially published Amendment 75.

Electric Vehicles
Sept. 18
Major U.S. Companies Have Weakened Climate Pledges
Space
Sept. 24
NASA Completed Thermal Testing for Venus Probe
Space
Sept. 21
NASA Launched State Technical Workforce Initiative

The Big Picture

This amendment follows the established pattern of iterative updates within the annual NASA Research Opportunities in Space and Earth Science (ROSES) framework. By standardizing researcher profiles, the agency shifts closer to a unified digital submission ecosystem.

Researchers applying for NASA grants must update their submission packets to reflect the new SciENcv requirements. Failure to align with these format adjustments could result in delays or rejection of future scientific proposals.

The takeaway

Standardization efforts like Amendment 75 reflect the evolving requirements for federal grant transparency. Investigators should verify all proposal materials against the latest agency guidelines before every submission deadline.