Lawmakers Drafted Audit Exemption for Small Broker-Dealers
The proposed legislation aims to reduce compliance costs for small firms by removing PCAOB audit requirements.
Updated on Sept. 21, 2026 in Financial Crime

Live Poll
Should small investment brokers be exempt from complex federal audit requirements?
Representative French Hill has introduced a bill to exempt small, non-custodial broker-dealers from Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) audit rules. Senator Tom Cotton is expected to introduce the companion Senate legislation shortly.
Why it matters
Small broker-dealers argue that existing PCAOB requirements are tailored for large institutions and impose excessive annual compliance costs. Proponents suggest the bill prevents smaller firms from being unfairly penalized due to their size.
The House Financial Services Committee previously marked up the measure in 2018. The proposed exemption would apply specifically to firms with fewer than 150 employees that do not hold client assets.
The players
French Hill
He is a U.S. Representative from Arkansas who focuses on financial services and regulatory policy.
Tom Cotton
He is a U.S. Senator from Arkansas who frequently advocates for conservative economic policies.
House Financial Services Committee
This committee oversees the entire financial services industry and considers legislation related to securities and banking.
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
This is a private-sector, nonprofit corporation created by the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act to oversee the auditors of public companies.
The details
The bill replaces PCAOB-specific rules with general auditing standards for eligible firms, a change that could impact approximately 80 percent of registered broker-dealers. This initiative follows reports from small firms that PCAOB audits cost tens of thousands of dollars each year, complicating operations for businesses with limited staff.
Timeline
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was enacted in 2002.
The Dodd-Frank Act expanded audit rules in 2010.
The House Financial Services Committee marked up the bill in 2018.
French Hill introduced the House version of the bill on September 17, 2026.
Congressional elections are scheduled for November 2026.
Legal Context
This legislation represents a push to refine the oversight framework established by the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act. By seeking to carve out smaller firms, it challenges the broader trend of increasing regulatory parity across all sizes of financial entities.
Small broker-dealers that qualify for the audit exemption could see a direct reduction in annual compliance expenses, potentially allowing them to redirect capital toward client services. However, the bill does not alter existing protections for firms that hold client assets, ensuring those custodians remain subject to standard oversight.
The takeaway
The proposed bill highlights the ongoing tension between maintaining rigorous financial oversight and minimizing the operational burden on smaller market participants. Readers should monitor whether this exemption successfully balances compliance efficiency with continued market transparency.
What happens next
The companion Senate bill is expected to be introduced early the week of September 21, 2026, though legislative movement is not expected until after the November 2026 elections.
Further reading
For additional context on regulatory oversight, visit the Financial Crime section.
Live Poll
Should small investment brokers be exempt from complex federal audit requirements?










