Trump Backed Keeping UN Headquarters in New York

The administration affirmed that the United Nations will remain at its current base in New York City.

Updated on Sept. 20, 2026 in International Relations

Bold flat-color editorial illustration of a modernist high-rise structure, representing international diplomacy through clean architectural geometry. — The Trump administration has officially affirmed its support for maintaining the United Nations headquarters at its current site in New York City. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Should the United States prioritize keeping the United Nations headquarters on American soil?

President Donald Trump has expressed support for keeping the United Nations headquarters in New York. The administration indicated that the site remains the preferred location for fostering international cooperation.

Why it matters

The U.S. government maintains that a permanent central hub is essential for nations to gather and overcome diplomatic differences. Keeping the headquarters in New York preserves the established venue for high-level global assembly.

The statement comes during the 81st session of the UN General Assembly, which is meeting in New York. The administration rejected suggestions of moving the hub to locations such as Brussels, Moscow, or Beijing.

The players

Donald Trump

Donald Trump is the current President of the United States.

Mike Waltz

Mike Waltz serves as the U.S. Permanent Representative to the United Nations and acts as the lead diplomatic liaison for the administration.

The details

Mike Waltz, the U.S. Permanent Representative to the UN, confirmed the administration's stance in a recent interview with Fox News. He emphasized that the current New York location serves the primary mission of providing a neutral ground for international dialogue.

September 2026 marks the high-level week of the 81st UN General Assembly session.

Political Context

Opposition to keeping the UN in New York often stems from critics who favor moving the organization to more strategically aligned regions or reducing the U.S. financial and administrative burden associated with hosting. Dissenting voices argue that relocating the headquarters could better reflect shifts in global power dynamics away from the post-war Western-led order.

The decision ensures that New York will continue to host major international events and diplomatic traffic, maintaining current local security protocols. Residents and businesses near the headquarters should expect ongoing high-security zones and periodic traffic disruptions associated with international delegations.

The takeaway

Maintaining the UN headquarters in New York serves as a signal of continued U.S. commitment to multilateral diplomacy in its historic home. This stance effectively ends speculation regarding potential relocations to international cities like Brussels, Moscow, or Beijing.