Canada Reviews Firearm Classifications Following Shooting
The federal government is evaluating gun regulations including the status of the SKS rifle.
Updated on Oct. 21, 2026 in Hunting
Live Poll
Do you believe government-appointed advisory groups effectively lead to policy changes or simply cause delays?
Ottawa is moving forward with a review of its firearm classification framework, including the SKS rifle. This process follows a February 10, 2026, mass shooting in Tumbler Ridge, B.C., that resulted in eight deaths.
Why it matters
The government aims to modernize the legal regime for firearms, magazines, and ammunition to enhance public safety. Officials plan to consult with First Nations, Inuit, and Métis communities as part of the evaluation.
Since May 2020, Ottawa has prohibited approximately 2,500 types of firearms. The SKS rifle remains legal in Canada as the government continues its review.
The players
Public Safety Canada
This federal department is responsible for matters related to public safety and emergency management in Canada.
RCMP
The Royal Canadian Mounted Police serves as the national police force for the country.
The details
The Firearms Classification Technical Advisory Group, which provides expert advice to the RCMP and Public Safety Canada, has not yet met since its appointment. The government will weigh the group's future advice before finalizing any changes to firearm status.
Timeline
May 2020: The government began prohibiting specific firearm types.
December 2025: Ottawa announced a comprehensive review of the classification regime.
February 10, 2026: A mass shooting occurred in Tumbler Ridge, B.C.
Fall 2026: The advisory group is expected to hold its first meeting.
Culture Shift
This policy review reflects a broader national shift toward modernizing the Canadian firearms classification regime. The move aligns with ongoing efforts to integrate diverse perspectives, including those of Indigenous communities, into federal safety processes.
Owners of the SKS rifle may see changes to the legal status of their equipment depending on the outcomes of the federal review. Consultations with Indigenous communities are expected to shape the implementation of any new regulatory standards.
The takeaway
The government is prioritizing the inclusion of Indigenous perspectives in the classification process before making final decisions. Readers should monitor future announcements regarding the advisory group's recommendations to understand potential regulatory changes.
Further reading
For additional context on sporting and firearm regulations, visit the Hunting section.
Live Poll
Do you believe government-appointed advisory groups effectively lead to policy changes or simply cause delays?
