Canada Lacks Unified Science Infrastructure Strategy
A new expert panel report highlights the need for better federal coordination across national research facilities.
Updated on Oct. 20, 2026 in Physics

Live Poll
Does the federal government provide sufficient strategic planning for national research and scientific infrastructure projects?
The Council of Canadian Academies released a report on Tuesday identifying a lack of strategic planning in the governance of federal science infrastructure. Experts argue that improved national-level coordination is necessary to optimize the country's research enterprise.
Why it matters
The findings suggest that without a centralized framework, Canada struggles to manage complex research systems, including large-scale facilities and digital assets effectively. This oversight complicates the nation's ability to participate in and benefit from major international scientific projects.
The expert panel evaluated governance and support for major research facilities, mobile assets, and digital infrastructure. Their analysis compared federal funding streams against the requirements for strategic national-level planning.
The players
Council of Canadian Academies
This is an independent, non-profit organization that supports evidence-based, expert assessments to inform public policy in Canada.
Mélanie Joly
She is the Federal Industry Minister who confirmed she has been briefed on previous recommendations for a research co-ordination body.
Canada Foundation for Innovation
This is a non-profit corporation that invests in research infrastructure at universities, colleges, research hospitals, and non-profit research institutions.
The details
The report underscores the challenges of managing diverse scientific assets, ranging from the Canadian Light Source in Saskatchewan to underwater sensor arrays in British Columbia. While the federal government tasked the Canada Foundation for Innovation with developing a new framework in 2024, that plan has yet to be approved or publicly released.
Timeline
2017: A landmark review of science in Canada was conducted.
2023: An OECD review noted ambiguity in Canadian scientific partnership negotiations.
April 2024: Canada joined the international Square Kilometer Array project.
October 20, 2026: The Council of Canadian Academies released the report.
The Big Picture
The findings extend the critiques found in the 2017 landmark review of science in Canada, suggesting that the structural governance challenges identified years ago persist today. This report challenges existing assumptions about the efficiency of current federal research management.
A cohesive national framework could eventually streamline how Canadian scientists access and contribute to global projects like the Square Kilometer Array. This may lead to more predictable funding and operational support for major domestic facilities like the Canadian Light Source.
The takeaway
Achieving efficient research outcomes often requires balancing individual project needs with a broader, long-term national strategy. Researchers and stakeholders should monitor for future federal announcements regarding the proposed research facility framework.
Further reading
Learn more about the current state of national research at Canada Physics.
Live Poll
Does the federal government provide sufficient strategic planning for national research and scientific infrastructure projects?










