High Court Rejects Appeal in Transgender Discrimination Case

Australia's top court has declined to hear an appeal regarding a discrimination ruling involving the app Giggle for Girls.

Updated on Oct. 23, 2026 in Women’s Issues

High Court Rejects Appeal in Transgender Discrimination Case

Live Poll

Should policies meant to promote equality for one group ever exclude other protected groups?

The High Court of Australia has rejected an application to appeal a landmark discrimination ruling involving transgender woman Roxanne Tickle. This decision finalises the legal process following a 2026 ruling that found Giggle for Girls discriminated against Tickle based on her gender-related appearance.

Why it matters

The ruling underscores that measures intended to promote female workforce representation or specific group equality cannot be used to justify discriminatory practices under the Sex Discrimination Act. It clarifies that individual beliefs about gender do not provide a legal basis for excluding transgender women from public-facing digital services.

The Full Federal Court doubled Roxanne Tickle's compensation to $20,000, which includes $8,000 in aggravated damages. Additionally, the court ordered Giggle for Girls and Sall Grover to pay legal costs capped at $100,000.

The players

Roxanne Tickle

She is the transgender woman who brought the discrimination case against the app Giggle for Girls after being excluded.

Sall Grover

She is the founder of the app Giggle for Girls who was found to have discriminated against Tickle based on gender-related appearance.

High Court of Australia

This is the highest court in the Australian judicial system and the final court of appeal for the nation.

Full Federal Court

This is a superior court of record that presided over the appellate process in the discrimination case.

The details

The dispute began in 2021 when Sall Grover excluded Tickle from the app Giggle for Girls, leading to a legal challenge under the Sex Discrimination Act. The court specifically determined that the exclusion constituted direct discrimination after overturning a previous finding of indirect discrimination.

2021: Sall Grover excluded Roxanne Tickle from the app.
2024: Federal Court found indirect discrimination and awarded $10,000.
15 May 2026: Full Federal Court ruled in favour of Roxanne Tickle.
October 2026: High Court rejected the appeal.

Culture Shift

This case reflects a broader shift in Australian society regarding the intersection of gender identity and digital platform governance. It indicates a move away from legacy exclusion models toward a more rigorous application of civil rights protections in tech-enabled environments.

This outcome clarifies the legal obligations for developers and business owners regarding inclusion policies on their platforms. It serves as a reminder of the compliance standards required to operate digital services without violating federal equality laws.

The takeaway

This decision reaffirms that digital platforms operating in Australia must adhere to federal laws prohibiting gender-based discrimination. Business owners should review their terms of service to ensure they align with these established legal requirements.