Hannan Says U.S. Tariffs Hurt Britain's Exports
Former European Parliament member Daniel Hannan discussed the effects of U.S. tariffs and American politics in a WTMJ interview.
Updated on Nov. 8, 2026 in International Trade
Live Poll
Do you think U.S. tariffs are doing more harm than good for American consumers?
Lord Daniel Hannan of Kinsclere, who serves in Britain's Parliament, discussed the effects of U.S. tariffs and American politics on WTMJ Conversations on November 8, 2026. He noted that the Supreme Court ruled the first set of tariffs an abuse of power, after which importers could claim refunds.
Why it matters
Hannan's comments highlight the cost tariffs impose on the countries that levy them, since foreign governments were not paying them. The discussion also points to reduced export wealth for the United Kingdom.
The interview cites tariffs invoked about one and a half years before November 8, 2026, with no export-loss figures provided. Unresolved is the size of UK export losses and the total refunds paid to importers after the Supreme Court ruling.
The players
Daniel Hannan
Daniel Hannan, Lord of Kinsclere, is a British politician who spent twenty years in the Parliament of the European Union before serving in Britain's Parliament.
Donald Trump
Donald Trump is the current President of the United States, who invoked the tariffs discussed in the interview and has made two state visits to the UK.
The details
Hannan argued that tariffs mainly penalize the country that imposes them, because foreign governments were not paying them. He also described the Supreme Court's ruling on the first set of tariffs as an abuse of power, which opened a path for importers to claim refunds.
Timeline
Approximately one and a half years before November 8, 2026: President Trump invoked tariffs.
Unspecified date after the tariffs were invoked: The Supreme Court ruled the first set of tariffs an abuse of power.
November 8, 2026: Hannan's interview aired on WTMJ Conversations.
Market Dynamics
The Supreme Court's ruling that the first set of U.S. tariffs was an abuse of power opened a refund path for importers, shifting the trade fight from policy to court outcomes. Hannan's comments place the cost burden on the countries imposing tariffs, a view that differs from the tariff rationale used by Washington.
Importers that paid tariffs may be able to claim refunds following the Supreme Court ruling, which could affect cash flow and budgeting for trade-exposed businesses. Investors in companies that rely on UK exports should watch how continued tariff pressure affects those firms' margins.
The takeaway
Tariffs can carry costs for the country imposing them, which makes the outcome of legal challenges and refund claims a practical concern for businesses. Readers involved in cross-border trade should track court rulings and refund eligibility.
Further reading
Explore more coverage in International Trade to see how tariffs reshape cross-border commerce.
Source note: This article includes information reported by WTMJ.
Live Poll
Do you think U.S. tariffs are doing more harm than good for American consumers?
