Study Finds 1 in 15 Hit by AI Deepfake Abuse

A survey of 7230 people in Australia, the UK and the US examines the non-consensual creation and sharing of explicit AI-generated images.

Updated on Nov. 3, 2026 in Sex Life

Bold flat-color editorial illustration of a cracked padlock in navy and cream with an oxblood accent, evoking the violation of personal boundaries by AI-generated abuse.
A survey of 7,230 people in Australia, the UK and the US found one in 15 has been victimised by non-consensual AI-generated explicit images, with women reporting more emotional harm. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Should tech companies face stronger legal duties to prevent AI explicit images?

A study surveying 7230 participants from Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States found that one in 15 people have been personally victimised through the non-consensual creation, sharing, or threatened sharing of explicit AI-generated images. The survey was conducted in July and August 2024 and was funded by Google.

Why it matters

The findings show the harm is widespread and uneven, with young people and women experiencing it most acutely in different ways. They arrive as a digital duty of care bill is before federal parliament in Australia.

The survey of 7230 participants found one in 15 people personally victimised, with young people over 4.35 times more likely to be affected than older groups. Whether these rates will change under new laws has not yet been measured.

The players

Nicola Henry

Nicola Henry is a researcher at RMIT University who led the study on explicit AI-generated deepfake images.

eSafety Commissioner

The eSafety Commissioner is Australia's independent regulator for online safety, responsible for enforcing civil penalties against online harms.

The details

Men reported the highest rates of having explicit AI images created of them without consent, while women reported a broader range of harms and greater negative emotional and social impacts. Women were much more likely to feel depressed, sad or afraid for their safety than to report anger or humiliation.

Timeline

  1. July and August 2024: Survey of 7230 participants conducted.

  2. 2024: Federal government established nationwide criminal penalties for sharing non-consensual deepfake pornography online.

  3. Wednesday, November 2026: Study published, led by Nicola Henry from RMIT University.

  4. End of 2026: Draft legislation for Tasmania due for public consultation.

Legal Context

Australia's 2024 federal nationwide criminal penalties for sharing non-consensual deepfake pornography set the national baseline. Creation of such images is criminalised only in Victoria, NSW, South Australia, Western Australia and Queensland, while Tasmania has yet to criminalise sharing.

Residents in states without creation offences should check whether their local laws cover the non-consensual creation of AI explicit images. Anyone concerned about being targeted can review the nationwide federal penalties for sharing such images.

The takeaway

The survey shows the harm of explicit AI deepfakes reaches far beyond a single group, and legal protections vary sharply by jurisdiction. Knowing the rules where you live is a practical first step toward protecting yourself online.

What happens next

Draft legislation for Tasmania is due to be released for public consultation by the end of 2026.

Further reading

Explore more on Sex Life for context on intimate online harms.

Source note: This article includes information reported by Blayney Chronicle.

Live Poll

Should tech companies face stronger legal duties to prevent AI explicit images?