GHG Protocol Delays Stricter Emissions Reporting Rules

The organization indefinitely continues current reporting methods following overwhelming pushback from surveyed companies.

Updated on Oct. 26, 2026 in Current Conditions

Bold flat-color editorial illustration showing a wind turbine pylon and transmission tower, symbolizing the pause in industrial energy reporting policy.
The GHG Protocol has indefinitely delayed stricter Scope 2 emissions reporting requirements following significant opposition from surveyed organizations concerned about excessive costs. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Do you believe stricter emissions reporting for companies encourages or discourages clean energy investment?

The GHG Protocol has delayed the mandatory application of stricter Scope 2 emissions reporting requirements after receiving significant opposition from organizations. Companies may continue utilizing existing reporting methods until a future date that has not yet been determined.

Why it matters

The delay addresses widespread concerns that proposed hourly matching and deliverability requirements would impose excessive costs and discourage global participation in clean energy markets. By allowing firms to continue using current standards, the organization aims to prevent market disruption and restricted investment.

Only 12% of respondents supported the proposed hourly matching requirement, while 82% indicated low or no support. Additionally, 86% of organizations cited concerns over the administrative burden and costs associated with the new reporting standards.

The players

GHG Protocol

This international organization develops comprehensive standardized frameworks to measure and manage greenhouse gas emissions for the public and private sectors.

Independent Standard Board

The board provides governance and oversight for the development of international corporate standards regarding sustainability and environmental reporting.

The details

Under the new guidance from the Independent Standard Board, companies must continue to disclose which of two existing reporting methods they utilize rather than transitioning to the proposed rules. The protocol opted for this path after 87% of respondents warned that deliverability requirements would restrict investment in renewable energy development.

Timeline

  1. 2015: The GHG Protocol published its initial Scope 2 emissions guidance.

  2. 2024: The organization launched a Technical Working Group to review standards.

  3. October 2025: A consultation on proposed reporting changes was launched.

  4. Q2 2027: The GHG Protocol plans to consult on updated Scope 2 revisions.

  5. Q4 2028: The publication of a joint corporate standard is anticipated.

Seasonal Patterns

The current decision marks a formal delay in replacing the GHG Protocol's 2015 Scope 2 guidance, effectively extending the use of established reporting standards indefinitely. This shift represents a departure from the anticipated transition toward stricter hourly matching requirements.

Reporting organizations may continue to use their current Scope 2 accounting methods for the time being. Companies should ensure they remain in compliance by clearly disclosing which of the two approved reporting methods they choose to utilize.

The takeaway

The decision underscores the difficulty of balancing rigorous emissions accounting with the operational realities of global clean energy markets. Organizations should prepare for future transparency requirements while continuing to utilize established reporting frameworks.

What happens next

The GHG Protocol intends to hold consultations on updated Scope 2 revisions in Q2 2027, followed by the expected publication of a joint corporate standard in Q4 2028.

Further reading

For more on evolving sustainability standards, visit the Current Conditions page.

Live Poll

Do you believe stricter emissions reporting for companies encourages or discourages clean energy investment?