Experts Analyzed Middle Powers and Digital Governance
A panel at the Forum 2000 Conference examined the role of technology coalitions amid ongoing US-China strategic competition.
Updated on Oct. 13, 2026 in Remote Work
Live Poll
Should your country prioritize forming technology coalitions to counter the influence of major powers?
The Institute for Security and Development Policy and the Stockholm Center for South Asian and Indo-Pacific Affairs hosted a discussion on authoritarian influence. The event centered on democratic technology coalitions and resilient supply chains.
Why it matters
The discussion explored how middle powers can navigate the complex US-China strategic landscape. It highlighted the importance of collaborative digital governance and sustainable infrastructure in global markets.
Two new Stockholm Papers were released as part of a broader research initiative examining strategic influence. These reports provide a foundational assessment of regional architectures in South Asia and the Indian Ocean Region.
The players
Institute for Security and Development Policy
This research organization focuses on international security and development issues, particularly regarding influence architectures.
Stockholm Center for South Asian and Indo-Pacific Affairs
This center facilitates research and collaboration concerning geopolitical dynamics in the South Asian and Indo-Pacific regions.
Forum 2000 Foundation
This foundation hosts the annual Forum 2000 Conference in Prague to discuss democratic values and global challenges.
The details
The panel titled Guardians or Bystanders? examined strategies for semiconductor cooperation, green technology development, and the contest against authoritarian influence. The research specifically analyzed how strategic influence architectures are structured across the Indian Ocean Region.
Timeline
The event and report release occurred on October 13, 2026.
Market Landscape
This research release contributes to the growing body of work surrounding The Silk Noose series, which tracks the evolution of strategic economic influence. By mapping these architectures, the initiative helps define the competitive position of democratic coalitions against rising regional powers.
Professionals and stakeholders in the tech sector may see increased focus on supply chain transparency and regional digital governance standards. These shifts are likely to influence the operational requirements for companies managing cross-border infrastructure projects.
The takeaway
Understanding the role of middle powers in technology coalitions provides insight into how global supply chains might shift in the coming years. Policymakers and business leaders should monitor these emerging influence architectures to anticipate potential regulatory or infrastructure changes.
Further reading
Explore more analysis regarding global labor and corporate shifts in Remote Work.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Institute for Security and Development Policy.
Live Poll
Should your country prioritize forming technology coalitions to counter the influence of major powers?
