Researchers Evaluated In-Car Infotainment Distraction
A University of Newcastle study measured how complex infotainment interfaces increase driver distraction levels.
Updated on Oct. 10, 2026 in Car Types
Live Poll
Do you feel that modern in-car touchscreen systems make it harder for you to drive safely?
Researchers have tested 10 different in-car infotainment systems to determine how much they divert a driver's attention from the road. The three-year study utilized eye-tracking technology to monitor concentration lapses during system interactions.
Why it matters
Understanding how various interfaces impact driver focus helps manufacturers refine designs and assists regulators in assessing vehicle safety. It also provides consumers with objective data to compare the usability of different systems.
The study tested 10 infotainment systems, finding the Cupra Ateca required 11 steps and caused six seconds of distraction per task. By contrast, Apple CarPlay required an average of two steps and resulted in just over one second of distraction.
The players
University of Newcastle
This educational institution led the research efforts into driver distraction and vehicle technology.
Apple CarPlay
This is a mobile integration platform developed by Apple that mirrors a smartphone interface on a car display.
Cupra Ateca
This is a performance-oriented SUV model manufactured by the Spanish automotive brand Cupra.
Android Auto
This is a mobile app developed by Google that allows users to mirror features from an Android device to a vehicle's infotainment system.
The details
Researchers used eye-tracking glasses to measure how extra steps in infotainment interactions increase visual concentration lapses. At a speed of 60km/h, the data highlights significant differences in how long a driver remains blind while navigating menus.
Timeline
The University of Newcastle conducted the research over a three-year period.
Roadmap
The push for standardized distraction testing mirrors efforts seen in the National Weather Service's Air Quality Index thresholds by establishing measurable safety benchmarks. This shift toward quantified human-machine interaction data marks a departure from subjective evaluations in the auto industry.
Drivers can utilize this data to identify systems that prioritize streamlined interfaces over complex menus, potentially reducing time spent with eyes off the road. Understanding these distraction metrics may influence future vehicle purchase decisions for safety-conscious car buyers.
The takeaway
Complexity in digital interfaces is directly linked to increased visual distraction during driving. Consumers should prioritize systems that require fewer interactions to complete basic navigation and media tasks.
Further reading
Learn more about the latest developments in Car Types.
More information
Review the full findings and methodology using the AAA driver distraction test tool.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Perth Now.
Live Poll
Do you feel that modern in-car touchscreen systems make it harder for you to drive safely?
