Bulk Carrier Grounded Twice in Tidal River

A report detailed how expectation bias and bank suction led to a ship grounding after a pilot misjudged current strength.

Updated on Oct. 7, 2026 in Current Conditions

A large cargo ship sits stranded on a sandbank in the middle of a wide, overcast tidal river.
A bulk carrier remained aground for three days after drifting outside a tidal channel and sustaining structural damage on underwater shoals. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Do you believe junior staff should challenge experts when they suspect a safety risk?

A bulk carrier grounded twice in a tidal river after drifting 42 metres outside the channel. The vessel eventually remained aground for three days after suffering bottom shell plating ruptures on underwater shoals.

Why it matters

The incident highlights critical risks in maritime navigation when pilots experience expectation bias regarding environmental conditions. The collision emphasizes how bank suction and misjudged currents can lead to significant structural damage.

The vessel operated with an 11.7-metre draught in a channel with a 12.2-metre dredged depth, leaving just 0.5 metres of under keel clearance. The ship drifted 42 metres outside the channel to starboard before striking underwater shoals.

The players

The Nautical Institute

This international representative body for maritime professionals publishes technical reports and safety analysis.

The details

The pilot maneuvered the vessel outside the starboard side of the channel, erroneously expecting a strong current to push the ship toward port. After initial grounding, the pilot used aggressive engine and rudder maneuvers in a failed attempt to proceed, eventually grounding the ship a second time at a speed of 6.5 knots.

Timeline

  1. 2026: The Nautical Institute published the incident report, known as Mars Report 202628.

Seasonal Patterns

This story follows a pattern of safety analysis established by the Nautical Institute's MARS reporting program, which serves as a central repository for global maritime incident data.

Maritime operators and pilots are urged to account for the phenomenon of bank suction when navigating restricted tidal channels with minimal under keel clearance. Ensuring precise adherence to channel markers remains the primary safety defense against grounding on underwater shoals.

The takeaway

This incident demonstrates that even experienced pilots can be compromised by expectation bias in complex navigation environments. Maintaining situational awareness and accounting for hydrodynamic forces like bank suction are essential to preventing similar hull-breaching accidents.

Further reading

Learn more about maritime safety protocols in our Current Conditions section.

Source note: This article includes information reported by SWZ|Maritime.

Live Poll

Do you believe junior staff should challenge experts when they suspect a safety risk?