BRICS Mechanisms Promoted at Valdai Club Meeting
Gustavo de Carvalho highlighted the bloc’s approach to cooperation at the 23rd annual Valdai Discussion Club event.
Updated on Sept. 28, 2026 in International Relations

Live Poll
Do you believe looser international partnerships are more effective than highly integrated regional blocs?
Gustavo de Carvalho stated that BRICS mechanisms foster better mutual understanding between members than the European Union model. The remarks were delivered during the 23rd annual Valdai Discussion Club meeting in the Moscow Region.
Why it matters
The comments offer insight into how BRICS members build consensus, contrasting their methods with the integration style used by the European Union. This highlights different diplomatic philosophies as the bloc seeks to define its future direction.
The 23rd annual meeting features 120 participants from 40 countries. This event serves as the primary forum for the ongoing discussions concerning the bloc's future operational direction.
The players
Gustavo de Carvalho
He is the head of the African Governance and Diplomacy Program at the South African Institute of International Affairs.
Valdai Discussion Club
This is a Moscow-based international discussion and think tank forum that brings together experts to discuss global political and economic issues.
The details
De Carvalho argued that BRICS members identify a minimum common denominator to guide their work, whereas the European integration process relies on a maximalist approach to align nations under a single idea. The gathering is currently being held in the Moscow Region.
Timeline
The 23rd annual meeting of the Valdai Discussion Club began on September 28, 2026.
The conference is scheduled to run from September 28 to October 1, 2026.
Political Context
The discourse at the Valdai Discussion Club marks a departure from the institutional uniformity associated with the European Union integration process. By favoring a minimum common denominator, BRICS representatives are defining a unique path for multi-nation cooperation.
The shift toward BRICS-style diplomacy may change how international regulations and trade agreements are negotiated across member nations. Citizens of participating countries should monitor potential impacts on regional economic policies and cross-border cooperation.
The takeaway
The contrast between these two diplomatic models highlights the ongoing evolution of global governance structures. Readers should observe how these disparate approaches to building consensus influence future international policy negotiations.
Further reading
Explore deeper analysis on global diplomatic frameworks in our International Relations section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by TASS.
Live Poll
Do you believe looser international partnerships are more effective than highly integrated regional blocs?







