Gashi Urged EU to Create Special Hague War Crimes Court

The proposal follows criticism of the Belgrade War Crimes Court for low conviction rates in Kosovo massacre cases.

Updated on Sept. 21, 2026 in Criminal Justice

Bold flat-color editorial illustration of a grand neoclassical stone archway, evoking institutional gravity and the pursuit of justice.
Shkëlzen Gashi has urged the European Union to establish a special war crimes court in The Hague to address unprosecuted Kosovo conflict atrocities. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Should international courts hold all nations equally accountable for war crimes committed during regional conflicts?

Shkëlzen Gashi has called for the European Union to establish a Special Court in The Hague to address unprosecuted war crimes in Kosovo. He contends that the current Belgrade War Crimes Court has failed to secure accountability for the vast majority of atrocities documented during the 1998-1999 conflict.

Why it matters

The proposal highlights a significant gap in justice for 105 documented massacres, with Gashi arguing that international oversight is necessary to ensure perpetrators face trial. This move seeks to address the frustration surrounding the Belgrade court's limited success in prosecuting war-time violence.

The Belgrade War Crimes Court has only reached final convictions in three of 105 documented massacres. Cases involving the massacres in Lubeniq and Qyshk have remained ongoing since 2014.

The players

Shkëlzen Gashi

He is an advocate who has publicly criticized the judicial response to war crimes committed during the conflict in Kosovo.

Belgrade War Crimes Court

This is the primary judicial body in Serbia responsible for prosecuting war crimes related to the conflicts in the former Yugoslavia.

The details

Gashi pointed to successful prosecutions like those of Saša Cvjetan, Radojko Repanović, and Rajko Kozlina as rare exceptions within a system he deems largely ineffective. He asserts that Serbia must be held accountable for the remaining crimes, contrasting the existing Serbian judicial process with the proposed international alternative.

Timeline

  1. Massacres occurred in Kosovo during the 1998-1999 war.

  2. Saša Cvjetan was sentenced in 2004 for the Podujevë massacre.

  3. Radojko Repanović was sentenced in 2009 for the Suharekë massacre.

  4. Proceedings for the Lubeniq and Qyshk cases have been ongoing since 2014.

  5. Rajko Kozlina was sentenced in 2019 for the Tërnje massacre.

The Big Picture

This proposal reflects a broader effort to model international justice after the Kosovo Specialist Chambers in The Hague. It posits that a specialized international court could succeed where domestic jurisdictions have stalled.

The proposal highlights potential shifts in international legal oversight that could impact how war crimes are addressed globally. Increased international scrutiny may lead to new judicial structures or changes in regional legal cooperation.

The takeaway

This push for a new tribunal underscores the ongoing difficulty of securing legal accountability long after a conflict ends. Establishing specialized international courts remains a primary, if contested, method for pursuing justice when domestic systems are viewed as inadequate.

Further reading

For more information on the evolution of international legal standards, visit the Criminal Justice section.

Source note: This article includes information reported by Albeu.com - Lajmet e fundit dhe jo vetëm!.

Live Poll

Should international courts hold all nations equally accountable for war crimes committed during regional conflicts?